TISSNET Question Papers

TISSNET Question Paper: Candidates vying for admission in the Tata Institute of Social Sciences can practice for the entrance exam by solving previous year question papers of TISSNET. The TISSNET previous year question papers will help the candidates to get familiar with the exam pattern. Additionally, the previous year question paper of TISSNET will help the candidates how the questions are structuredand also them tocomprehend the difficulty level of questions which will be asked in the entrance exam. The Tata Institute of Social Science National Entrance Test (MAT) is conducted for screening of candidates into the HRM programme offered by the institute across its various campuses. As one of the most sought after entrances in the country, it witnesses an intense competition and thus, TISSNET previous year question papers will help the candidates to score better and improve their chances of qualifying in the exam along with improving your chances of securing admissions. Aspirants can read below to know about the entrance test including exam pattern, question paper pattern and download previous year question papers of TISSNET.

TISSNET Exam Pattern 2021

The TISSNET exam pattern will help candidates know about the exam duration, marking scheme, mode of exam, etc. Knowing the exam pattern of TISSNET 2021 will help the candidates to formulate their preparation strategy accordingly and practice from the previous year question papers keeping the same in mind. TISSNET exam pattern does not included negative marking for incorrect answers or unattempted questions. Candidates can thus, use the exam pattern of TISSNET 2021 to their advantage to answer maximum number of questions in the entrance test. Details about the exam pattern of TISSNET have been provided below.

TISSNET 2021 Exam Pattern

Particulars

Details

Mode of examination

Computer-Based

Medium of examination

English

TISSNET Exam Duration

100 minutes

Total Number of Questions

100

Question Type

Multiple Choice Questions

Total Marks

100

Marking scheme

+1 mark for every correct answer, No negative marking for incorrect answer/unanswered questions

TISSNET Question Paper Pattern 2021

The question paper pattern of TISSNET is prescribed by the conducting authority and it helps the aspirants understand the weightage of the various sections in the question paper. This will help the candidates devote their time to each of the sections accordingly. The previous year question papers of TISSNET will also highlight the TISSNET question paper pattern. Candidates can find details of the TISSNET 2021 question paper pattern below.

Section

No. Of Questions

Marks

General Knowledge

40

40

English Proficiency

30

30

Analytical Ability and Logical Reasoning

30

30

TISSNET Previous Year Question Papers

Practising previous year question papers of TISSNET is an important part of the preparation strategy. Candidates who solve TISSNET previous year question papers will not only get to know about the exam pattern and level of difficulty, type of questions asked etc but will also provide them with a  qualitative review of their preparation. TISSNET 2021 will comprise questions from a number of topics. Practising TISSNET Question Papers will allow the candidates to make list of the topics that they are confident along with mapping out topics they would be required to work on. This will allow the candidates to finesse their preparation before the actual exam. Candidates can find links to TISSNET question papers below from where they can download and practise the same free of cost.

5 Questions to Ask When Evaluating a New Cybersecurity Technology

The cybersecurity technology field is, shall we politely say, crowded. I recently returned from attending RSA, one of the biggest conferences in the industry. Trying to describe just how many new technologies and solutions I saw there feels a lot like trying to describe how big space is: Our brains can't actually process that kind of scale. 

I imagined being a chief information security officer (CISO) at this event, trying to make decisions on what products or technologies would solve their particular organization's security weaknesses. It was, in trying to maintain my earlier commitment to being polite, overwhelming. There must be a better way to quickly figure out if a security technology is worth evaluating. 

This ecosystem we have found ourselves in, of slapping new technologies into our security stacks, isn't working. Security staffs everywhere are pulled too thin trying to manage every new technology, and threat actors are continuously breaking through our protection technologies. 

So, how do we break this cycle? When looking for security technologies, we start assessing how much value the technology provides — not just whether it can do what it promises to do, but also if it provides a net positive for the entire security stack and management teams. 

We are moving into a new era of cybersecurity, and every investment must be prudent. In order to make these decisions, companies must start asking some fundamental questions about these technologies in order to understand the true value — or cost — of a security solution. These questions of proactivity, intelligence, autonomy, scalability, and benefit to the stack as a whole can help you find the most value in every security technology.

Importantly, these questions can also help you evaluate your existing technologies, as you now know in real life how they are (or are not) serving your network and your teams. The answers might surprise you. 

While almost any cybersecurity technology will be quick to use the word "proactive," we first should define what the term really means. A truly proactive technology is one sitting "left of boom," or, more simply, before a successful breach. Recently, almost all cybersecurity technology sits "right of boom," responding to and mitigating the effects of breaches that have already happened. 

In modern security frameworks and stacks such as MITRE/NIST/zero trust, often the only left-of-boom technology in place is the firewall/next-generation firewall (NGFW). These decades-old technologies have been tasked with more and more, and yet they remain standard. We have to help the rest of the security stack by investing in more proactive technologies. 

It has become increasingly clear that the word of our time is "intelligence" — be it artificial, human, or, more in my world, cyber. The value of intelligence and data has never been higher, and this has proven especially true in the war against cybercriminals. 

The future is intelligence driven, and the more intelligence a cybersecurity technology can act on, the better. Any cybersecurity technology must be informed by as much cyber/threat intelligence as possible. Without the data to make informed decisions about enforcement, threat actors automatically have an upper hand. 

I cannot think of a cybersecurity technology that doesn't claim it is "autonomous." This has become so common in our industry that the word itself has almost lost meaning. However, with a cybersecurity staffing shortage that does not look to be going away any time soon, it's critical we evaluate what we mean by "autonomous" when thinking about a technology.

How many hours of an employee's day (on average) does this technology require? Does this technology require another full-time employee to manage the alerts or logs? Does this technology automatically update? (And what are the down times like for them?) The answers to these questions should be: zero, no, and yes. Anything else is not an autonomous technology. 

Threat actors have shown themselves to be nimble, inventive, and persistent in their attacks. The technologies we implement must be able to grow and adapt to these realities. Can they adapt to higher volumes, deeper obfuscations, and yet-unknown attack vectors? Knowing your technologies can grow with your network and adapt to an ever-changing threat landscape is vital in any security technology investment. 

One of the biggest drivers of cybersecurity professionals is what's known as "alert fatigue." This is caused by too many technologies that are extremely sensitive in finding threats or breaches, yet are unable to communicate with each other easily, throwing multiple alerts for the same malicious traffic. The cybersecurity teams are then forced to sift through multiple erroneous/duplicate alerts, and are more prone to errors due to the large volume of traffic networks are receiving day and night. Sadly, this is just one example of how multiple technologies that aren't sharing information can impact a network's cybersecurity posture. 

Any new cybersecurity technology you consider should be not just a neutral addition to the security stack, but rather a benefit to the other technologies or people managing them. Some questions to ask in this arena might be: Can it feed intelligence easily to other implemented technologies? Does it ease a pain point of another technology? Can it ingest information from other implemented technologies? 

Rarely will a technology be able to adequately answer for more than one of these questions. For instance, a technology might be able to use lots of intelligence but isn't proactive and needs constant monitoring by employees. These are the challenges security teams face every time they make a decision about a new or existing security technology, but figuring out how much value each technology adds — or doesn't — is the best start.

Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) Exam

The qualification tests for several occupations in the financial services industry, formerly known as the Series exams, have been streamlined into one initial exam called the Securities Industry Essentials Exam—or the SIE Exam. Passing this exam qualifies you to pursue a career in the financial services industry.

Back in 2015, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) streamlined its testing structure by consolidating the fundamental knowledge shared across several of the Series exams into the SIE. Candidates can then take an additional "top-off" qualification exam for the specific field they hope to enter.

The SIE had a major structural impact on the qualification exams. The SIE replaces portions of every previous exam, including the Series 6, Series 7, Series 22, Series 55/56 (replaced by Series 57), Series 79, Series 82, Series 86/87, and Series 99. These tests were shrunken, becoming qualification exams that focus on the specialized knowledge needed for each particular qualification.

Top-off exams are offered for the following representative categories:

Overall, this was clearly an effort to remove some of the duplicated information in the tests, but it also opened the door to a much more important change to the process of qualification, which is no longer having to be associated with a FINRA member firm to take the SIE.

Under the former FINRA rules, you generally needed to be employed or otherwise sponsored by a FINRA member in order to take the exams. The SIE removes this requirement, although you still have to be associated with a FINRA member firm to take the top-off exams. This means that an individual can choose to start on the path towards a FINRA qualification on their own.

Successfully taking the SIE doesn't guarantee anyone a successfully break into the financial industry, but it is safe to say that passing it prior to looking for a job may give you an edge as a prospective employer only needs to sponsor the top-off exam to get you qualified for a particular role.

FINRA supported the idea that recent graduates and people looking to get into the industry should take the SIE on their own. They’ve made it more attractive by extending the validity of the SIE to four years, giving a generous window for passing participants to then find a firm to sponsor the top-off exams. FINRA member firms are able to see who has passed the exam via the Central Registration Depository (CRD).

In their original Securities and Exchange Commission filings, FINRA targeted the fall of 2016 to early 2017 for a rollout of their highest volume exams. This proved to be a bit optimistic. There were several shifts in the scheduling, one resulting from the requests of member firms and industry associations for more time to set their own processes in accordance with the new structure. The SIE and top-off exam rollout took place on Oct. 1, 2018 and was accompanied by the retirement of multiple low-volume exams, such as the Series 42 and Series 62.

Originally, March 2018 was targeted for the implementation of the SIE and top-offs for Series 6, 7, and 79. Oct. 1, 2018 became the date for a complete overhaul rather than a phased-in approach. Adding to some of the confusion was part of the attempt to modernize; the Series 55 was replaced by the Series 57, although it still appeared in the original notice for the SIE updates. That update was simply a standard part of FINRA reviewing and tweaking curriculum, rather than part of an overhaul of any core knowledge.

The SIE exam structure is largely based on the general knowledge components of the exams it replaced that portion for. In January 2018, FINRA provided more details on the structure. The sections and question count are as follows:

The 75 questions are actually 85, since there are 10 randomly distributed pre-test questions that do not count towards the score on the exam. Candidates have an hour and forty-five minutes to complete the entire exam. A full outline of the SIE content is currently available on FINRA's website.

Passing the SIE exam can provide a number of benefits to your career:

If you already passed one of the FINRA exams and are currently registered as a representative, you are considered to have passed the SIE already. If you passed one of the exams and are not currently registered, you may need to take the SIE depending on how many years elapse between now and your next registration. And, of course, if you passed the exam but your registration has lapsed, you will need to take the SIE and the new top-off for that qualification before being reregistered.

This is pretty much the same as it has always been, except you would be taking two exams instead of one. In fact, the exams are designed to take the same total time as the previous versions. For example, the SIE and Series 7 top-off exam take the same amount of time as the previous Series 7 exam.

For member firms, the cost of the top-off exams is less than the previous exams because the content was shifted to the SIE. So, if an individual has passed the SIE prior to joining a firm, it is a good indication that this person already has the basic aptitude and wherewithal to pass a top-off exam. The cost of getting that individual registered is reduced because they paid out-of-pocket for the SIE, which will likely help make a candidate more attractive to a firm.

The Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) Exam is designed to assess your knowledge of the securities industry. It ensures that people entering the industry are qualified and knowledgeable for the work they are doing. It streamlines the previous initial qualification exams into a single test, supplemented by "top-off" qualification exams.

If you want to be registered to work in a securities business, you must pass the SIE and the appropriate qualification exam for the type of securities work you'll be doing. If you already took one of the old exams and your license lapsed—assuming two years have passed since you were last registered—you have to retake the Series 7. You need to retake the SIE only if four years have elapsed since you last passed it or were last registered.

The overall content covered over the two tests—the SIE and the Series 7 top-off exam—will be nearly identical to the previous Series 7.

FINRA does not share the SIE pass rates. However, various test prep companies state that around 25-27% of candidates fail the exam on the first try. If you fail and want to retake the exam, the wait time is 30 days for the first and second attempts, then six months if you fail the third attempt.

If you were already sponsored to take one of the qualification exams, go for it. These changes won't impact you at all. If you expect to be sponsored in the future, the overall content you need to master won’t change even though you have to do it in two chunks. If, however, you are not currently sponsored or in the industry, the SIE will open the door for you to start down the path of a financial career without having to associate with a member firm first. This change gives you a choice you didn't have before.